Security Clearance news
Applicant With Kidnapping Conviction Denied by DOHA
I ran across a rather unusual Defense Office of Hearing and Appeals (DOHA) case involving serious criminal conduct occurring in 2007. In most cases, the time elapsed since then would have mitigated the concerns, but in this particular instance, they did not. Here are the highlights of the case. In
Stay Within the Scope of What Questions are Asking for on the SF-86
Background investigators can tell you they hate it when they are interviewing someone who has listed information way beyond what the scope of the questions are asking for on the Questionnaire for National Security Positions (SF-86). That is because the investigator has to cover all of the information listed by
1983bigbass: SEAD6 is CE/CV So go ahead and don’t report it. See how that works out for you. There is no distinction between sf86 and mandatory reporting when you have…
Thesis? Arrogant? I literally stated in this thread that I reported to the FSO? You should probably relax a little bit here. It’ll be ok, I promise.
Interestingly enough: SEAD 3 covers mandatory reporting events SEAD 4 categorizes SEAD 6 governs CE I encourage you to read SEAD 3 and not use search engines that lead back…
You just proved my point. If you already know the answer, why are you asking? I specifically sourced you to what DCSA says is mandatory reporting “Any arrest, regardless of…