Security Clearance news
Liar Liar Pants on Fire
Another Defense Office of Hearing an Appeals (DOHA) case to shake your head at and say, “What the heck was he thinking?” This security clearance applicant was denied eligibility under personal conduct for lying multiple times about having used marijuana within the last seven years. Take note, the DoD did
DEA Drug Use Policy for Potential Applicants
The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) is responsible for enforcing compliance with the Controlled Substances Act, thus, their threshold for tolerance of illegal or experimental drug use for job applicants is much lower than other federal agencies, and this includes the use of marijuana or THC products. Currently, the DEA timeline
1983bigbass: SEAD6 is CE/CV So go ahead and don’t report it. See how that works out for you. There is no distinction between sf86 and mandatory reporting when you have…
Thesis? Arrogant? I literally stated in this thread that I reported to the FSO? You should probably relax a little bit here. It’ll be ok, I promise.
Interestingly enough: SEAD 3 covers mandatory reporting events SEAD 4 categorizes SEAD 6 governs CE I encourage you to read SEAD 3 and not use search engines that lead back…
You just proved my point. If you already know the answer, why are you asking? I specifically sourced you to what DCSA says is mandatory reporting “Any arrest, regardless of…