Security Clearance news
Not Disclosing Getting Fired Leads to Security Clearance Denial
I see this time and time again where an applicant undergoing a background investigation fails to disclose getting fired from employment. Usually, the reason for getting fired is based on performance and attendance issues. This in and of itself will not result in an unfavorable adjudicative determination, but failure to
Latest DCSA Statistics and Reforms for Investigation Processing
The Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency (DCSA) published their latest investigation processing stats a few days ago. This includes the processing of the investigations and the adjudication piece of it. They also provided the numbers on how many were enrolled in Trusted Workforce (TW) 1.25 Continuous Vetting (CV)and Rap Back enrollment. There is a
1983bigbass: SEAD6 is CE/CV So go ahead and don’t report it. See how that works out for you. There is no distinction between sf86 and mandatory reporting when you have…
Thesis? Arrogant? I literally stated in this thread that I reported to the FSO? You should probably relax a little bit here. It’ll be ok, I promise.
Interestingly enough: SEAD 3 covers mandatory reporting events SEAD 4 categorizes SEAD 6 governs CE I encourage you to read SEAD 3 and not use search engines that lead back…
You just proved my point. If you already know the answer, why are you asking? I specifically sourced you to what DCSA says is mandatory reporting “Any arrest, regardless of…