Security Clearance news
Lying About a DUI Charge Costs Applicant Clearance Eligibility
I see this over and over in security clearance denial cases. The applicant fails to disclose something that in and of itself is not serious or disqualifying for clearance eligibility. However, by doing that they have now created a new issue that is potentially disqualifying under the adjudicative guidelines for
DRP and RIFs Make Current and Former Clearance Holders Ripe for Recruitment
The news outlets are brimming with stories about the massive amount of federal government workers getting fired, taking the deferred resignation offer, or getting ousted as a part of reductions in force. Many of these workers currently have or have previously held a security clearance and had access to classified
Where did you hear this information and from what vendor indicated this is a pilot program? Unfortunately I believe this is the new norm of seven due dates.
Unfortunately some investigators are brainwashed/scared by the employers/management. You know that FIs will just be working off the clock to meet these expectations.
CACI. All communication from the top down to the SLs are saying it’s “just a pilot”, and the results will be revaluated at the end of the 60 day period,…
Peraton is doing 7 day due dates so it doesn’t appear to be a pilot thing to me. Seems to be very much DCSA driven.