Security Clearance news
Don’t Listen to Bad Advice on Clearance Applications
Security clearance applicants should beware of heeding advice that contradicts answering truthfully and providing full disclosure on the SF-86. Ultimately, it is you who will have to answer the mail when it comes out during the course of the investigation process. A defense contractor found this out the hard way
Changes to Adjudicative Guidelines for Drug Involvement
As noted in a posting by William Henderson on our main site regarding the recent release of Security Executive Agent Directive (SEAD) 4 – National Security Adjudicative Guidelines, a few changes were made to some of the adjudicative definitions and concerns. Guideline H: Drug Involvement and Substance Misuse has some
Okay noted I just won’t mention it. Thanks for the advice.
That makes a little more sense. You’re worried about a non issue. You disclosed your relationship with him, you filled out the appropriate FNC forms. You have nothing to worry…
Thank you! That makes me feel much better about this process. I appreciate the feedback.
AntiPolygraph.org The polygraph operator doesn’t have the time to read your SF-86. The questions on the polygraph are standardized. Everyone gets the same relevant questions @AntiPolygraph.org I disagree with the…