Security Clearance news
Don’t Listen to Bad Advice on Clearance Applications
Security clearance applicants should beware of heeding advice that contradicts answering truthfully and providing full disclosure on the SF-86. Ultimately, it is you who will have to answer the mail when it comes out during the course of the investigation process. A defense contractor found this out the hard way
Changes to Adjudicative Guidelines for Drug Involvement
As noted in a posting by William Henderson on our main site regarding the recent release of Security Executive Agent Directive (SEAD) 4 – National Security Adjudicative Guidelines, a few changes were made to some of the adjudicative definitions and concerns. Guideline H: Drug Involvement and Substance Misuse has some
I think finding alternative uncleared work for the next 7-10 years may be your best bet. Maybe after no issues for 7-10 years give it another try.
…I believe it is a matter of security and lessons learned. I believe it is a fact software set up to monitor (protect the government) caught it. I do not…
Definitely not. They had to be aware of something and were actively monitoring them. That is the only way this would be on their radar. There is no system or…
I hope I correctly read the OP’s posts. a) you misused your government furnished equipment to break into another person’s personal account while on government time/property. b) You were a…