Security Clearance news
Don’t Listen to Bad Advice on Clearance Applications
Security clearance applicants should beware of heeding advice that contradicts answering truthfully and providing full disclosure on the SF-86. Ultimately, it is you who will have to answer the mail when it comes out during the course of the investigation process. A defense contractor found this out the hard way
Changes to Adjudicative Guidelines for Drug Involvement
As noted in a posting by William Henderson on our main site regarding the recent release of Security Executive Agent Directive (SEAD) 4 – National Security Adjudicative Guidelines, a few changes were made to some of the adjudicative definitions and concerns. Guideline H: Drug Involvement and Substance Misuse has some
It’s not how I feel it’s what I’ve heard from the Fed’s for years what I’m conveying. They seem to be an entitled bunch of whiners for only carrying 30%…
Duetooversight: an entitled bunch of whiners for only carrying 30% of their agency workload Some places I’ve worked, they don’t even carry that much.
Ding ding ding Correct! What goes up must come down.
Attention, be advised from this time forth please use the following introduction. “Hello my name is blah blah blah and I’m a Special Messenger working on your background investigation for…