Security Clearance news
Are there Differences in Continuous Monitoring for a Government Clearance Holder vs a Contractor?
Insider threat, leakers, and counterintelligence concerns have led to changes in the way security clearance holders are vetted and monitored. Reinvestigations have gone by the wayside and continuous vetting (CV) is now the way forward. One would think the same CV standards would apply to all clearance holders, whether they
Companies Use Loophole in Keeping Clearance Active
In accordance with Executive Orders and policy guidance from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, the granting of a security clearance should only be done when there is a legitimate need for access to classified information. Defense Industry companies are highly encouraged to keep the numbers of cleared
1983bigbass: SEAD6 is CE/CV So go ahead and don’t report it. See how that works out for you. There is no distinction between sf86 and mandatory reporting when you have…
Thesis? Arrogant? I literally stated in this thread that I reported to the FSO? You should probably relax a little bit here. It’ll be ok, I promise.
Interestingly enough: SEAD 3 covers mandatory reporting events SEAD 4 categorizes SEAD 6 governs CE I encourage you to read SEAD 3 and not use search engines that lead back…
You just proved my point. If you already know the answer, why are you asking? I specifically sourced you to what DCSA says is mandatory reporting “Any arrest, regardless of…