Security Clearance news
Former Navy Contractor Gets Six Months Jail Time for Lying on Security Clearance Application
On the Questionnaire for National Security Positions (SF-86) in the section labeled “Penalties for Inaccurate or False Statements” it states: The U.S. Criminal Code (title 18, section 1001) provides that knowingly falsifying or concealing a material fact is a felony which may result in fines and/or up to five (5) years imprisonment.
DoD Underreporting Adverse Information is an Issue
In the security clearance world we all know reporting adverse information or suspicious behavior for clearance holders is a requirement, but does it happen? Based on my own experience I would say the odds are 50-50 depending on who is involved and the potential impact. A recent study conducted by
Where did you hear this information and from what vendor indicated this is a pilot program? Unfortunately I believe this is the new norm of seven due dates.
Unfortunately some investigators are brainwashed/scared by the employers/management. You know that FIs will just be working off the clock to meet these expectations.
CACI. All communication from the top down to the SLs are saying it’s “just a pilot”, and the results will be revaluated at the end of the 60 day period,…
Peraton is doing 7 day due dates so it doesn’t appear to be a pilot thing to me. Seems to be very much DCSA driven.