Security Clearance news
Time Alone does not Mitigate a Long History of Criminal Conduct
The adjudicative guidelines use mitigating factors in making security clearance determinations. One of those factors is the amount of time elapsed since the conduct occurred. In rare instances even administrative judges get it wrong in applying mitigating factors, which is exactly what happened in a security clearance appeal last month. The Defense
Scams Artists from China Target Unwitting Security Clearance Applicants
I have noticed an uptick in the number of Defense Office of Hearing an Appeals (DOHA) cases involving security clearance applicants who unwittingly fell for scams involving foreign nationals from China. How does this happen? Here are two actual DOHA case scenarios: This security clearance applicant meets a Chinese woman online in
Mine went pretty smoothly. He did say the machine didn’t like my serious crimes response once then never mentioned it again. That was pretty much it. I voluntarily disclosed some…
that is also what happened to me lmao, he said the machine didn’t like the serious crimes one, and i did admit some stupid stuff i did when i was…
You didn’t “fail.” If there was something wrong with your test, you would have received notification that the agency is discontinuing your application of employment. When your polygrapher said your…
Vanilla_Spice22: When your polygrapher said your case is going to the adjudicator, that means you “passed” the polygraph section of the background investigation. You are still being processed and hopefully…