Background Investigations

NISPPAC Report Shows Top Secret Clearance Reinvestigation Times Increasing

On August 3, 2011 the National Industrial Security Program Policy Advisory Committee (NISPPAC) report for March 2011 was posted at their website.  NISPPAC is made up of representatives from Government and industry and meets two to three times a year.  Meetings usually include presentations by the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) and the Defense Industrial Security Clearance Office (DISCO) on industrial security clearance processing metrics.  The March meeting also included a presentation by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) on the activities of the Joint Suitability and Security Clearance Reform Team…

Overall there were no surprises in the report, but some interesting trends and anomalies were apparent. Since last year end-to-end processing time for Top Secret (TS) Periodic Reinvestigations (PR) has been increasing, but DISCO’s inventory of TSPRs pending adjudication dropped from a high of 4,372 in September 2010 to a miniscule 266 in February 2011. Defense Security Service (DSS) officials could provide no explanation. OPM might have temporarily slowed down their processing of TSPRs in December and January to catch up on initial clearance investigations. Timeliness of TSPRs is sometimes sacrificed when it’s necessary to reduce turnaround time on initial clearances. Since 3rd Quarter FY2009 the number of Phased PRs has declined significantly, but the number Phased PRs converted to SSBI-PRs remained about the same, indicating that unlisted security issues surfaced in a much higher percentage of Phased PRs.  DISCO’s total inventory of cases pending adjudication declined from a high of 18,727 in October 2010 to 10,757 in February 2011—a significant accomplishment during a time of diminishing personnel resources caused by the Base Realignment And Closure process.

In an interesting comment on eAdjudication, the Director of DSS stated that the eAdjudication process [at other DOD Central Adjudication Facilities] handles 28–34 percent of investigations for Secret clearances; whereas, only 4 percent of Industrial cases are adjudicated electronically.

Among other things the ODNI presentation addressed the revision of the Federal Investigative Standards for suitability and security clearances.  In December 2008 a 3-tier structure for investigations was approved, but has apparently been abandoned in favor of a 5-tier structure.  Five tiers currently exist, but the investigative components of each tier will probably be different in the future.  NISPPAC meetings are open to the public, but for some reason the ODNI presentation was marked “For Official Use Only” and there was no indication that any information was redacted.

Comment Archive

  1. Avatar

    About 98% of the SSBI-PR’s should have been PPR’s, so unsure what they are doing. The use of PPR’s is minimal at best and we waste alot of time on the unecessary items. If you have been cleared more than once and barring issues, all should be submitted as PPR’s IMO.

  2. Avatar

    Thanks for this article, the report was really interesting. I just want to say thank you for this site, if not for this blog, I would never have come across this great information!!!

    A big thank you!!!

  3. Avatar

    Fed. Investigator:

    I’m glad this type of information is of interest to some of the people who frequent this blog. I realize it’s a bit esoteric and intended primarily for people like you who are involved in the process, but there is some information in the report that would also be of general interest. I provide it, because it’s not the type of report that gets any attention in the regular news media. I’ll continue to try to keep abreast of the changes that are occurring, but only about half of it ever appears in the public domain.

  4. Avatar

    Keep that info coming!!!

    Thanks again!!!

  5. Avatar

    I have a question about reinvestigation and clearance transfers.

    I have a TS/SCI/Fullscope through NSA as a civilian and I am thinking about transferring to the FBI. However, my reinvestation is almost here.

    First, will the clearance transfer directly? Like will I have to do anything extra?

    Second, who is the reinvestigation through? Would it be NSA or FBI if I switch now?

    Last, is there different requirements for the different clearances at FBI/NSA?

    Thanks!

  6. Avatar

    Lee:

    First, will the clearance transfer directly? IT SHOULD.

    Like will I have to do anything extra? NOT FOR THE SECURITY CLEARANCE BUT THERE MAY BE SOME DIFFERENT EMPLOYMENT SUITABILITY REQUIREMENTS.

    Second, who is the reinvestigation through? Would it be NSA or FBI if I switch now? IF YOU SUBMIT THE SF86 AT NSA, THE INVESTIGATION WILL BE DONE BY NSA’S INVESTIGATIONS CONTRACTOR. IF YOU WAIT TILL YOU’RE ONBOARD AT FBI, IT WILL BE DONE BY FBI CONTRACT INVESTIGATORS. I RECOMMEND YOU DON’T START YOUR PR AT NSA THEN MOVE WHILE IT’S PENDING.

    Last, is there different requirements for the different clearances at FBI/NSA? EACH LEVEL OF SECURITY CLEARANCE HAS ITS OWN INVESTIGATIVE STANDARD. THERE ISN’T ANYTHING MORE THAN AN SSBI WITH FSP.

  7. Avatar

    These information also helps those of us reading for guidelines about these processes. I have one question; I got my full Secret about a month ago for a contractor,and now the contractor is coming back saying we might need T/S for the new contract starting FY 2013.

    How quick can this process move if I had my full Secret a month ago? Any helpful advise will be much appreciated.

    Mr. Henderson-Why does it take two plus weeks to get your book from Amazon.com?